Energy and environmental performanceEE-005

Thermoelectric generation from cement-plant waste heat

Amrize · Alpena cement plant, Michigan, USA · reported 2025

Use this record when

The decision this case can inform

Use this record when evaluating low-grade waste-heat power and separating measured pilot output from projected full-scale economics.

Evidence scope

U.S. Department of Energy industrial validation pilot with measured gross, parasitic, net, and thermal performance. Full-scale reliability and annual savings remain projections.

Source-supported facts

What the public record actually establishes

4 sourced points
  1. F1

    The field pilot at Alpena used thermoelectric generation on a low-temperature cement-plant heat source.

  2. F2

    Measured output was 3.1 gross and 2.0 net kWh per tonne of clinker after parasitic consumption.

  3. F3

    System thermal efficiency reached 5.0% peak and 4.3% average; the evaluated hot-side temperature was roughly 130–212°F.

  4. F4

    $241,000 per year is a projection for a typical 3,300 t/day plant at $0.10/kWh, not an observed Alpena saving.

Structured interpretation

Facts and reported results are kept separate from the lesson a plant may choose to test.

01

Operating context

DOE evaluated pilot thermoelectric generation from low-grade cement-plant waste heat.

02

Intervention or finding

A pilot thermoelectric system was field validated with gross, parasitic, net, and thermal-efficiency measurements.

03

Documented result

Measured 3.1 gross and 2.0 net kWh/t clinker; system thermal efficiency 5.0% peak and 4.3% average. USD241000/y is a typical full-scale projection, not an observed Alpena saving.

04

Plant interpretation

Separate gross generation, parasitic load, net export, temperature window, capacity factor, maintenance, and scale-up economics.

05

Transfer boundary

Pilot performance does not establish full-scale lifecycle reliability or cost.

Before applying the lesson

Questions to verify at your plant

These are decision checks, not operating instructions. Resolve them through local risk assessment, technical review, and authorization.

  1. 01

    What usable temperature, heat flux, surface area, fouling, and operating availability exist over a full year?

  2. 02

    Which pumps, fans, controls, and cooling loads determine net rather than gross generation?

  3. 03

    Can modules survive dust, vibration, thermal cycling, cleaning, and access constraints at maintainable cost?

  4. 04

    Does the economic model use measured capacity factor, degradation, maintenance, installed cost, and local power value?