Reliability and maintenanceEX-007

A reliability team and condition monitoring in Croatia

CEMEX · Croatian cement operations, Croatia · 2012 report

Use this record when

The decision this case can inform

Condition monitoring needs trained ownership and maintenance follow-through.

Evidence scope

Supplier-reported evidence. This record establishes a milestone, not quantified operating savings.

Source-supported facts

What the public record actually establishes

2 sourced points
  1. F1

    A dedicated reliability group combined training with portable and online condition monitoring.

  2. F2

    The source documents a maintenance-program implementation across Croatian operations.

Structured interpretation

Facts and reported results are kept separate from the lesson a plant may choose to test.

01

Operating context

A group of plants needed a more systematic reliability approach.

02

Intervention or finding

A dedicated reliability group combined training with portable and online condition monitoring.

03

Documented result

The source documents a maintenance-program implementation across Croatian operations.

04

Plant interpretation

Condition monitoring needs trained ownership and maintenance follow-through.

05

Transfer boundary

No isolated numerical downtime or payback result; count as one program, not three invented plant results.

Before applying the lesson

Questions to verify at your plant

These are decision checks, not operating instructions. Resolve them through local risk assessment, technical review, and authorization.

  1. 01

    Define alarm ownership, intervention lead time and work-order follow-through.

  2. 02

    What equipment, materials and operating conditions differ at your plant?

  3. 03

    What baseline and follow-up evidence would establish whether this change works locally?