Regulatory and compliance historyEX-024

Industrial stormwater enforcement at Seattle

Ash Grove Cement · Seattle, Washington, USA · 2013

Use this record when

The decision this case can inform

Include industrial stormwater pathways and permit coverage in environmental reviews.

Evidence scope

EPA announcement of a settlement. This record establishes a milestone, not quantified operating savings.

Source-supported facts

What the public record actually establishes

2 sourced points
  1. F1

    EPA reported that the company obtained an individual stormwater permit and agreed to settle the violations.

  2. F2

    EPA announced a $600,000 penalty and described permit action.

Structured interpretation

Facts and reported results are kept separate from the lesson a plant may choose to test.

01

Operating context

EPA described unpermitted industrial stormwater discharges and metals concerns.

02

Intervention or finding

EPA reported that the company obtained an individual stormwater permit and agreed to settle the violations.

03

Documented result

EPA announced a $600,000 penalty and described permit action.

04

Plant interpretation

Include industrial stormwater pathways and permit coverage in environmental reviews.

05

Transfer boundary

Historical EPA settlement announcement, not an independently checked final court finding or evidence of current compliance. Agreed penalty is not proof of payment.

Before applying the lesson

Questions to verify at your plant

These are decision checks, not operating instructions. Resolve them through local risk assessment, technical review, and authorization.

  1. 01

    Preserve event date and distinguish regulator allegations, settlement terms and verified corrective performance.

  2. 02

    What equipment, materials and operating conditions differ at your plant?

  3. 03

    What baseline and follow-up evidence would establish whether this change works locally?