Safety and occupational healthSH-002

Task-level dust and quartz exposure at Coplay

Coplay Cement Company · Nazareth, Pennsylvania, USA · 1982

Use this record when

The decision this case can inform

Use this record when segmenting respirable-dust and silica risk by quarry, raw-feed, coal, and finished-product work instead of applying one plant-wide assumption.

Evidence scope

Historical NIOSH industrial-hygiene survey. Results are specific to the people, tasks, materials, and standards sampled at Coplay at that time.

Source-supported facts

What the public record actually establishes

4 sourced points
  1. F1

    The survey evaluated total and respirable dust, quartz, trace elements, and process gases.

  2. F2

    Four respirable nuisance-particulate samples exceeded 5 mg/m³.

  3. F3

    Quartz was identified in 18 personal samples; six exceeded the then-applicable MSHA limit.

  4. F4

    The report localized the principal quartz concern to quarry, raw-material, and coal-related work.

Structured interpretation

Facts and reported results are kept separate from the lesson a plant may choose to test.

01

Operating context

NIOSH evaluated total and respirable dust, quartz, trace elements, and gases.

02

Intervention or finding

Field sampling localized quartz exposure mainly to quarry, raw-material, and coal areas.

03

Documented result

Four respirable nuisance-particulate samples exceeded 5 mg/m3; quartz appeared in 18 personal samples and six exceeded the then MSHA limit.

04

Plant interpretation

Treat quarry, raw-feed, and coal systems as distinct exposure zones and verify source controls with job-specific sampling.

05

Transfer boundary

Historical limits; results describe sampled work and cannot be generalized to current conditions.

Before applying the lesson

Questions to verify at your plant

These are decision checks, not operating instructions. Resolve them through local risk assessment, technical review, and authorization.

  1. 01

    Are exposure groups separated by material and task, including quarry and coal-system work?

  2. 02

    Which intermittent jobs could be diluted by full-shift averages or missed by area sampling?

  3. 03

    Do current mineralogy data support the silica assumptions used in the exposure plan?

  4. 04

    Are controls re-tested after feed-source, fuel, ventilation, or work-practice changes?